So, this year- in late 2011, there are going to be two brand new FPS games on the market. As we all know, they are the latest installment to Infinity Ward's best selling first person shooter franchise- Modern Warfare 3, as well as Battlefield 3- EA's latest bid into the big world of first person shooters. Obviously, the two are being compared all the time. So where do I stand on the matter? Read on to find out.
Well, in my humble opinion, there in never going to be a clear winner. This is because they are both two very different games. On one side of the equation is Modern Warfare 3- a game that is going to automatically be full of novices and campers. It's bound to have record sales, which means it has to have people who lack skill in playing FPS games. On the other hand is Battlefield- a game well known for actually requiring tactics and having less noobs. It's likely to have sales similar to Modern Warfare 3 now though, so it may have lost it's charm in that respect.
As for me, I am probably going to say that I am more likely to buy Modern Warfare 3, as I love owning noobs and running around with an LMG and having fun. I'm not as into the tactics as much aa other guys are, and I'm happy to keep on killing the inexpirenced.
No comments:
Post a Comment